GPS Signal Jamming - brought to you by...

While preparing for a recent flight, COPA staff member Adam Hunt happened to see a NOTAM amongst the myriad of NOTAMs for the Toronto FIR that highlighted a planned GPS jamming exercise at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa, near Ottawa. Adam is a very conscientious pilot and always checks ALL of the NOTAMs, including the more obscure and sometimes difficult to decipher FIR NOTAMs. It is very likely that a significant number of pilots did not see that NOTAM, relied on their GPS as a sole source of navigation and were surprised when it went off the air.
In a strongly worded communiqué to the Department of National Defence, NAV CANADA and Transport Canada, COPA President Kevin Psutka questioned the need to actually jam versus simulate jamming and also questioned why the goals of the exercise cannot be achieved by performing it in a remote area of the country. Deliberate jamming of the GPS signal over such a large area (out to 250 nm) and in a location that will effect a vast area of some of the busiest airspace in North America is just not acceptable and Psutka illustrated his point with some statistics. About a year ago COPA surveyed our membership regarding their use of GPS. We found that 68% had either a panel-mounted or handheld GPS and that 30% of those who did not have a GPS were planning to do so in the next year. This survey was examined against the Transport Canada pilot statistics in key areas and it was determined that the statistics from our survey are representative of the pilot population as a whole. So, a conservative estimate of the percentage of Canadian pilots using GPS now is 75%. The NOTAM states that jamming will occur as far as 250 nm. This encompasses western Quebec as far as Quebec City and Montreal, portions of the States of Vermont, New York and Pennsylvania and most of southern Ontario including London, Toronto, Kingston, Ottawa, North Bay and Sudbury.
The vast majority of pilots and aircraft in Ontario and Quebec are located in the effected area. According to Transport Canada statistics, of the 65,000 licences and permits in force in Canada, 38,000 are in Quebec and Ontario. Given our survey results, there are 28,500 people in the affected area in Canada who use GPS and could miss the NOTAM and mistakenly follow a jammed GPS signal. I cannot estimate the number of pilots affected south of the border, but given the concentration of pilots in the north east of the US, it is easily tens times this number.
The civil aircraft register web site was not available at the time that this message was developed but we know from our past studies that the number of aircraft closely parallels the distribution of pilots. So, of the 29,000 aircraft in Canada, there are approximately 12,700 aircraft equipped with a handheld or panel-mounted GPS in the affected area in Canada alone.
Of course, the majority of the pilots mentioned above are not instrument rated and COPA appreciates that GPS is supposed to be an aid rather than a primary means of navigation for VFR flight. However, if there is any way that deliberate jamming can be prevented or at least minimized, the safety of these users will not be degraded. Psutka suggested several measures to help mitigate the risk from the deliberate jamming, such as only conducting the test during VFR weather conditions, but the authorities decided to proceed anyway, on the basis that they thought it was safe and they had the right to do so. After all, it is a military system and we should be greatful that we are able to use it at all.
COPA has requested that the issue of GPS signal jamming be added to the agendas of the next ANSNAC and Part VIII CARAC meetings so that solutions can be found for a safer way to perform these exercises and notify affected people. In the meantime, please take this report as an example of why you should always check all NOTAMs before every flight and not to depend on GPS as your sole source of navigation. You may be surprised at the worst possible time in your flight.
Contact Kevin Psutka.